Comparison of Feedback from ChatGPT and Human Professors in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Objectives: To compare the feedback provided by human professors and ChatGPT on university students’ work and to report on students’ perceptions of both types of feedback. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases searched included Web of Sc...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo de revisión |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) Descargar el archivo |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares: Comparison of Feedback from ChatGPT and Human Professors in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
- Human and AI-generated feedback in higher education: A systematic review of effectiveness and student perceptions
- Adaptación y análisis psicométrico de la Escala basada en el Modelo de la Aceptación de la tecnología a Chat GPT (TAME-CHATGPT) en estudiantes universitarios que hicieron uso de ChatGPT en Juliaca, 2024
- Responsible practices and ethical behaviors in the use of artificial intelligence among university students
- AI self-efficacy as a predictor of satisfaction with studies: the mediating role of research motivation among Peruvian University students
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Adaptation of Students to Virtual Educational Environments
- AI self-efficacy and satisfaction with studies among Peruvian university students: the indirect role of language learning strategies