Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers
The aim of this work was to design and validate an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers. The instrument integrated the resolution of essential problems in society, management and co-creation of knowledge, use of ICTs, ethical life project and collaborative work. S...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Apuntes Universitarios |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Peruana Unión
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695017427271680 |
|---|---|
| author | Ponce Lopez, Itzetl Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Tobón Tobón, Sergio |
| author_browse | Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Ponce Lopez, Itzetl Tobón Tobón, Sergio |
| author_facet | Ponce Lopez, Itzetl Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Tobón Tobón, Sergio |
| author_sort | Ponce Lopez, Itzetl |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Apuntes Universitarios |
| description | The aim of this work was to design and validate an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers. The instrument integrated the resolution of essential problems in society, management and co-creation of knowledge, use of ICTs, ethical life project and collaborative work. Subsequent to its elaboration, the instrument was subject to expert review for the analysis of the validity of the facie and content, and the application to a pilot group for the feasibility analysis of a sample of 418 teachers, in order to analyze the validity of construct and reliability. From these phases it is indicated that the experts suggested improvements to the instrument and proposed its construction through an analytical rubric. In the expert judgment, the instrument was validated in general terms (V> 0.80); however, in writing several items had to be improved. In the application to the pilot group, an excellent degree of satisfaction was obtained with the instrument, as well as with the understanding of instructions and items. The construct validity analysis showed the representation of all the items, and the explanation of more than 62% of the variance by three factors (1. Resolution of essential problems in society and Management and co-creation of knowledge; 2. Use of ICTs and ethical life project; 3. Collaborative work), being similar to what was revealed by the cluster analysis. The reliability of the instrument was relevant for exploratory purposes (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.750). It is concluded that the rubric has validity of content and construct, and appropriate reliability. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/417 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2304-0335 2225-7136 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Apuntes Universitarios |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/4172020-06-17T13:15:54Z Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers Construcción y validación de un instrumento para evaluar el abordaje de la sociedad del conocimiento en docentes Ponce Lopez, Itzetl Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Tobón Tobón, Sergio reliability content construct teachers rubric knowledge society confiabilidad contenido constructo docentes rúbrica sociedad del conocimiento The aim of this work was to design and validate an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers. The instrument integrated the resolution of essential problems in society, management and co-creation of knowledge, use of ICTs, ethical life project and collaborative work. Subsequent to its elaboration, the instrument was subject to expert review for the analysis of the validity of the facie and content, and the application to a pilot group for the feasibility analysis of a sample of 418 teachers, in order to analyze the validity of construct and reliability. From these phases it is indicated that the experts suggested improvements to the instrument and proposed its construction through an analytical rubric. In the expert judgment, the instrument was validated in general terms (V> 0.80); however, in writing several items had to be improved. In the application to the pilot group, an excellent degree of satisfaction was obtained with the instrument, as well as with the understanding of instructions and items. The construct validity analysis showed the representation of all the items, and the explanation of more than 62% of the variance by three factors (1. Resolution of essential problems in society and Management and co-creation of knowledge; 2. Use of ICTs and ethical life project; 3. Collaborative work), being similar to what was revealed by the cluster analysis. The reliability of the instrument was relevant for exploratory purposes (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.750). It is concluded that the rubric has validity of content and construct, and appropriate reliability. El propósito del presente estudio fue diseñar y validar un instrumento para evaluar el abordaje de la sociedad del conocimiento en docentes. El instrumento integró la resolución de problemas esenciales en la sociedad, gestión y co-creación de conocimiento, uso de las TIC´s, proyecto ético de vida y trabajo colaborativo. Posterior a su elaboración, el instrumento se sometió a revisión por expertos para el análisis de validez de facie y contenido, y la aplicación a un grupo piloto para el análisis de factabilidad a una muestra de 418 docentes, con el objetivo de analizar la validez de constructo y confiabilidad. De estas fases se indica que los expertos sugirieron mejoras al instrumento y propusieron su construcción mediante una rúbrica analítica. En el juicio de expertos, el instrumento fue validado en términos generales (V>0.80); sin embargo, en redacción varios ítems tuvieron que ser mejorados. En la aplicación al grupo piloto, se obtuvo un excelente grado de satisfacción con el instrumento, así como con la comprensión de instrucciones e ítems. El análisis de validez de constructo mostró la representación de todos los ítems, y la explicación de más del 62% de la varianza por tres factores (1. Resolución de problemas esenciales en la sociedad y Gestión y co-creación de conocimiento; 2. Uso de TIC´s y proyecto ético de vida; 3. Trabajo colaborativo), siendo similar a lo revelado por el análisis de conglomerados. La confiabilidad del instrumento fue pertinente para fines exploratorios (Alfa de Cronbach: 0.750). Se concluye que la rúbrica posee validez de contenido y constructo, y apropiada confiabilidad. Universidad Peruana Unión 2020-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/417 10.17162/au.v10i1.417 Apuntes Universitarios; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios; 40 - 65 2304-0335 2225-7136 10.17162/au.v10i1 spa https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/417/490 https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/417/505 Derechos de autor 2019 Itzetl Ponce Lopez, Luis Gibran Juárez Hernández, Sergio Tobón Tobón |
| spellingShingle | reliability content construct teachers rubric knowledge society confiabilidad contenido constructo docentes rúbrica sociedad del conocimiento Ponce Lopez, Itzetl Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Tobón Tobón, Sergio Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| title | Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| title_alt | Construcción y validación de un instrumento para evaluar el abordaje de la sociedad del conocimiento en docentes |
| title_full | Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| title_fullStr | Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| title_short | Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| title_sort | construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate the approach of the knowledge society in teachers |
| topic | reliability content construct teachers rubric knowledge society confiabilidad contenido constructo docentes rúbrica sociedad del conocimiento |
| topic_facet | reliability content construct teachers rubric knowledge society confiabilidad contenido constructo docentes rúbrica sociedad del conocimiento |
| url | https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/417 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT poncelopezitzetl constructionandvalidationofaninstrumenttoevaluatetheapproachoftheknowledgesocietyinteachers AT juarezhernandezluisgibran constructionandvalidationofaninstrumenttoevaluatetheapproachoftheknowledgesocietyinteachers AT tobontobonsergio constructionandvalidationofaninstrumenttoevaluatetheapproachoftheknowledgesocietyinteachers AT poncelopezitzetl construccionyvalidaciondeuninstrumentoparaevaluarelabordajedelasociedaddelconocimientoendocentes AT juarezhernandezluisgibran construccionyvalidaciondeuninstrumentoparaevaluarelabordajedelasociedaddelconocimientoendocentes AT tobontobonsergio construccionyvalidaciondeuninstrumentoparaevaluarelabordajedelasociedaddelconocimientoendocentes |