Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education

Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: T...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Autores principales: Rami S. Kantar, Corstiaan C. Breugem, Kristen Keith, Serena N. Kassam, Charanya Vijayakumar, Mikaela Bow, Allyson R. Alfonso, Elsa M. Chahine, Lilian H. Ghotmi, Krishna G. Patel, Pradip R. Shetye, Pedro E. Santiago, Joseph E. Losee, Derek M. Steinbacher, Percy Rossell‐Perry, Daniela Gamba Garib, Nivaldo Alonso, Robert J. Mann, Jose Rolando Prada-Madrid, Elçin Esenlik, María del Carmen Pamplona, Marcus Vinícius Martins Collares, Ricardo D. Bennun, Ann W. Kummer, Carlos Giugliano, Bonnie L. Padwa, Cássio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral, Raymond Tse, Brian C. Sommerlad, Roberto L. Flores, Usama S. Hamdan
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Medicine
Specialty
Psychological intervention
Patient satisfaction
Confidence interval
Family medicine
Nursing
Medical education
Physical therapy
Internal medicine
Cleft Lip surgery
Cleft Palate surgery
Computer Simulation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Health Sciences Medicine Surgery Surgical Simulation and Training
Health Sciences Medicine Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Global Health and Surgery
Health Sciences Medicine Physiology Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Acceso en línea:Ver en el sistema de origen
Descargar el archivo
Ver en el sistema de origen
Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle)
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Sumario:Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P < .001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P < .001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants’ clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.

Ejemplares similares