Propiedades psicométricas de las medidas de violencia escolar: revisión sistemática

Measuring school violence is important due to its consequences for students’ physical, psychological, and educational well-being. The objective of this study was to systematically examine the reported measurement properties of instruments used to assess school violence and to evaluate the quality of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Autores principales: Calixto Tapullima-Mori, Sandra Lucero Pizzán Tomanguillo, Nieves del Pilar Pizzán Tomanguillo, Jhonattan Fideles da Silva, Sergio Bobadilla
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
school violence
bullying
psychometric properties
measurement instruments
COSMIN
Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire
reliability statistics
internal consistency
content validity
construct validity
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Acceso en línea:Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle)
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Sumario:Measuring school violence is important due to its consequences for students’ physical, psychological, and educational well-being. The objective of this study was to systematically examine the reported measurement properties of instruments used to assess school violence and to evaluate the quality of the studies according to the COSMIN criteria. The search and selection of studies were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 Statement in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scielo. Subsequently, the COSMIN criteria were applied to examine the completeness of reporting and compliance with the indicators corresponding to the reported measurement properties. A total of 47 studies evaluating 30 instruments on school violence were included. The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire and the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire accounted for the largest number of psychometric evaluations. Content-based evidence was reported for 11 instruments (36.7 %), six of which received at least one rating of full compliance. Internal structure was reported for all 30 instruments, although 29 achieved full compliance, while internal consistency was examined in 28 instruments (93.3 %). Reliability was reported for 20 instruments (66.7 %), and relationships with other variables were reported for 19 (63.3 %). In conclusion, although several measures show favorable evidence regarding certain psychometric properties, no instrument demonstrated full and uniform compliance across all indicators assessed by COSMIN. Therefore, their selection should take into account the purpose of the assessment, the characteristics of the population, and the cultural context of application.

Ejemplares similares