Preventive measures compliance on patients with mechanical ventilation in the Critical Care Unit at the Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, 2016

Objective: To determine preventive measures compliance on patients with mechanical ventilation in the Critical Care Unit at the Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study of longitudinal cut, the population was comprised of the patients that entered...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Publicado en:Revista Científica de Ciencias de la Salud
Autores principales: Medina Laura, Gladys, Gutiérrez Crespo, Hugo, Zamudio Eslava, Luisa A.
Formato: Artículo de revista
Lenguaje:español
Publicado: Universidad Peruana Unión 2018
Materias:
Preventive measures
pneumonia
mechanical ventilation
Medidas preventivas
neumonía
ventilación mecánica.
Acceso en línea:Ver en el sistema de origen
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Sumario:Objective: To determine preventive measures compliance on patients with mechanical ventilation in the Critical Care Unit at the Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study of longitudinal cut, the population was comprised of the patients that entered the Critical Care Unit. For convenience, a non-probabilistic sample was used, which was comprised of 50 patients who were studied during the months of June to November of 2016. Patients who passed away within 48 hours of admission were excluded. The instrument used was a verification list made up of a set of six preventive measures containing dichotomous type answers, with a reliability of 0.80 using the Richarson Kuder method. Results: 52% of the patients who average ≥ 60 years old, with a male predominance, the respiratory pathology constituted 60% of the cases, 58% of the patients had between 10 and 19 days of use of mechanical ventilation and 78% of the did not show pneumonia. The adequate handling of the airway, hand hygiene during the handling of the airways and head bedside elevation, showed 73.6% of compliance, while the evaluation and records of the necessity of sedoanalgesia showed 70.9% of compliance. Conclusions: in 54% of the studied patients the preventive measures were achieved.
ISSN:2411-0094
2306-0603

Ejemplares similares