The mediation of labor satisfaction in the relationship of the leadership style and organizational commitment

The objective of this work was to determine the relationship between job leadership style and job satisfaction, and how this relationship affects organizational commitment; using the leadership theory of Bass and Avolio, through the MLQ questionnaire. The organizational commitment was measured with...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Apuntes Universitarios
Autores principales: Guerrero Bejarano, María Auxiliadora, Manosalvas Vaca, Carlos, Salvador García, Claribel Rosario, Carhuancho-Mendoza, Ima Milagros, Maino Isaías, Aldo Alfredo, Silva Siu, Daniel Ricardo
Formato: Artículo de revista
Lenguaje:español
Publicado: Universidad Peruana Unión 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver en el sistema de origen
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of this work was to determine the relationship between job leadership style and job satisfaction, and how this relationship affects organizational commitment; using the leadership theory of Bass and Avolio, through the MLQ questionnaire. The organizational commitment was measured with the tool generated from the Meyer and Allen theory and job satisfaction with the Paul Spector questionnaire. The study was outlined with the theoretical basis of the quantitative approach, deductive, cross-sectional method. Data collection was carried out through the survey with the respective questionnaire for each variable, the sampling was for convenience, and 386 people participated voluntarily. Data were analyzed with an SEM model. The results show that the data have a good fit according to the Chicuadrado test; in addition, convergent and divergent validity was performed. Therefore, in Ecuadorian reality it was shown that transformational leadership is related to job satisfaction (r = .55, p <0.05), while transactional leadership is negatively related to satisfaction (r = -. 154, p <0.05). However, transactional leadership is not
ISSN:2304-0335
2225-7136