Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate
In the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis an...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Apuntes Universitarios |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Peruana Unión
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695026477531136 |
|---|---|
| author | Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Herrera Meza, Raúl |
| author_browse | Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis Herrera Meza, Raúl Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran |
| author_facet | Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Herrera Meza, Raúl |
| author_sort | Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Apuntes Universitarios |
| description | In the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis and an expert judgment was made for the content validity analysis. At the end of these phases, an instrument was piloted with 38 advisers to assess the degree of understanding of instructions and items, as well as the reliability of the instrument. The instrument was designed as a socio-formative analytical rubric integrating five aspects of the development of the thesis work through 11 items and for each of them five levels of performance with their own descriptor. The experts expressed writing suggestions to optimize the rubric. The expert judges validated the items in content (Aiken's V> 0.80; LV CI 95%>0.75). The piloting showed a good degree of understanding of the instructions and items and relevance of the questions and it was determined that the instrument has reliability (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.832). A valid content instrument is presented; however, it is necessary to continue with the analysis of its psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability) |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/632 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2304-0335 2225-7136 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Apuntes Universitarios |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/6322021-03-12T21:19:13Z Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate Diseño y validez de contenido de una rúbrica analítica socioformativa para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Herrera Meza, Raúl Socioformative rubric investigative competencies validity reliability expert judgment Rúbrica socioformativa competencias investigativas validez confiabilidad juicio de expertos In the present investigation, an instrument for evaluating postgraduate research competencies was designed and validated in content. For its design, aspects evidenced in the development of the thesis work were integrated. The instrument was reviewed by four experts for the facie validity analysis and an expert judgment was made for the content validity analysis. At the end of these phases, an instrument was piloted with 38 advisers to assess the degree of understanding of instructions and items, as well as the reliability of the instrument. The instrument was designed as a socio-formative analytical rubric integrating five aspects of the development of the thesis work through 11 items and for each of them five levels of performance with their own descriptor. The experts expressed writing suggestions to optimize the rubric. The expert judges validated the items in content (Aiken's V> 0.80; LV CI 95%>0.75). The piloting showed a good degree of understanding of the instructions and items and relevance of the questions and it was determined that the instrument has reliability (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.832). A valid content instrument is presented; however, it is necessary to continue with the analysis of its psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability) En la presente investigación, se diseñó y validó en contenido un instrumento para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado. Para su diseño se integraron aspectos evidenciados en el desarrollo del trabajo de tesis. El instrumento fue revisado por cuatro expertos para el análisis de validez de facie y para el análisis de validez de contenido se efectuó un juicio de expertos. Concluidas estas fases se realizó un pilotaje del instrumento con 38 asesores para evaluar el grado de comprensión de instrucciones e ítems, así como la confiabilidad del instrumento. El instrumento se diseñó como rúbrica analítica socioformativa integrando cinco aspectos del desarrollo del trabajo de tesis a través de 11 ítems y para cada uno de ellos cinco niveles de desempeño con un descriptor propio. Los expertos expresaron sugerencias de redacción para optimizar la rúbrica. Los jueces expertos validaron en contenido los ítems (V de Aiken>0.80; VI del IC al 95%>0.75). El pilotaje mostró un buen grado de comprensión de las instrucciones e ítems y relevancia de las preguntas y se determinó que el instrumento posee confiabilidad (Alfa de Cronbach: 0.832). Se presenta un instrumento válido en contenido, sin embargo, se requiere proseguir con el análisis de sus propiedades psicométricas (validez de constructo y confiabilidad). Universidad Peruana Unión 2021-01-23 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632 10.17162/au.v11i2.632 Apuntes Universitarios; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2021): Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios; 62 - 82 2304-0335 2225-7136 10.17162/au.v11i2 spa https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632/719 https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632/731 Derechos de autor 2021 Alicia Agromelis Aliaga Pacora, Luis Gibran Juárez Hernández, Raúl Herrera Meza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Socioformative rubric investigative competencies validity reliability expert judgment Rúbrica socioformativa competencias investigativas validez confiabilidad juicio de expertos Aliaga Pacora, Alicia Agromelis Juárez Hernández, Luis Gibran Herrera Meza, Raúl Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| title | Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| title_alt | Diseño y validez de contenido de una rúbrica analítica socioformativa para evaluar competencias investigativas en posgrado |
| title_full | Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| title_fullStr | Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| title_full_unstemmed | Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| title_short | Design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| title_sort | design and content validity of a socioformative rubric to evaluate investigative skills in postgraduate |
| topic | Socioformative rubric investigative competencies validity reliability expert judgment Rúbrica socioformativa competencias investigativas validez confiabilidad juicio de expertos |
| topic_facet | Socioformative rubric investigative competencies validity reliability expert judgment Rúbrica socioformativa competencias investigativas validez confiabilidad juicio de expertos |
| url | https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/632 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aliagapacoraaliciaagromelis designandcontentvalidityofasocioformativerubrictoevaluateinvestigativeskillsinpostgraduate AT juarezhernandezluisgibran designandcontentvalidityofasocioformativerubrictoevaluateinvestigativeskillsinpostgraduate AT herreramezaraul designandcontentvalidityofasocioformativerubrictoevaluateinvestigativeskillsinpostgraduate AT aliagapacoraaliciaagromelis disenoyvalidezdecontenidodeunarubricaanaliticasocioformativaparaevaluarcompetenciasinvestigativasenposgrado AT juarezhernandezluisgibran disenoyvalidezdecontenidodeunarubricaanaliticasocioformativaparaevaluarcompetenciasinvestigativasenposgrado AT herreramezaraul disenoyvalidezdecontenidodeunarubricaanaliticasocioformativaparaevaluarcompetenciasinvestigativasenposgrado |