Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation

This study aimed to identify the indicators of human resource productivity in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and the province of Boyer-Ahmad and to analyze their situation. This research is applied on purpose, descriptive-correlational in nature, using a survey research method. The statis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Apuntes Universitarios
Autores principales: Shahabi Nasab, Ali, Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza, Salajegheh, Sanjar, Sheykhi, Ayob
Formato: Artículo de revista
Lenguaje:español
Publicado: Universidad Peruana Unión 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver en el sistema de origen
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to identify the indicators of human resource productivity in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and the province of Boyer-Ahmad and to analyze their situation. This research is applied on purpose, descriptive-correlational in nature, using a survey research method. The statistical population was made up of all the employees of the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad (8,089 individuals), which according to the Cochran formula, the sample size was estimated at 366 individuals and the selection was based on a method of random grouping. To collect data, Goldsmith's (1980) employee productivity questionnaire was used. The experts confirmed the validity of the face and the content of the questionnaire, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was higher than 0.7, which shows the consistency between items and the confirmation of reliability. To examine the data, an exploratory factor analysis was performed using LISREL. According to the results, the data obtained was adequately adjusted with the factor structure of the indicator of productivity of human resources and the items of this indicator were consistent with the construction of the infrastructure. The results of the subscales showed that the indicators of motivation (89.34), ability (87.15) and credibility (80.05) were respectively in first to third place in terms of level of human resources of the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. In conclusion, it is suggested to emphasize the importance of competent and efficient human resources to improve organizational productivity and motivate human resources working in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad to work more and be more efficient using material and spiritual incentives.
ISSN:2304-0335
2225-7136