Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation
This study aimed to identify the indicators of human resource productivity in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and the province of Boyer-Ahmad and to analyze their situation. This research is applied on purpose, descriptive-correlational in nature, using a survey research method. The statis...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Apuntes Universitarios |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Peruana Unión
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695022107066368 |
|---|---|
| author | Shahabi Nasab, Ali Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza Salajegheh, Sanjar Sheykhi, Ayob |
| author_browse | Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza Salajegheh, Sanjar Shahabi Nasab, Ali Sheykhi, Ayob |
| author_facet | Shahabi Nasab, Ali Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza Salajegheh, Sanjar Sheykhi, Ayob |
| author_sort | Shahabi Nasab, Ali |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Apuntes Universitarios |
| description | This study aimed to identify the indicators of human resource productivity in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and the province of Boyer-Ahmad and to analyze their situation. This research is applied on purpose, descriptive-correlational in nature, using a survey research method. The statistical population was made up of all the employees of the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad (8,089 individuals), which according to the Cochran formula, the sample size was estimated at 366 individuals and the selection was based on a method of random grouping. To collect data, Goldsmith's (1980) employee productivity questionnaire was used. The experts confirmed the validity of the face and the content of the questionnaire, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was higher than 0.7, which shows the consistency between items and the confirmation of reliability. To examine the data, an exploratory factor analysis was performed using LISREL. According to the results, the data obtained was adequately adjusted with the factor structure of the indicator of productivity of human resources and the items of this indicator were consistent with the construction of the infrastructure. The results of the subscales showed that the indicators of motivation (89.34), ability (87.15) and credibility (80.05) were respectively in first to third place in terms of level of human resources of the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. In conclusion, it is suggested to emphasize the importance of competent and efficient human resources to improve organizational productivity and motivate human resources working in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad to work more and be more efficient using material and spiritual incentives. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/516 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2304-0335 2225-7136 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Apuntes Universitarios |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/5162020-09-02T22:42:52Z Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation Identificación de indicadores de productividad de recursos humanos en organizaciones ejecutivas y análisis de su situación Shahabi Nasab, Ali Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza Salajegheh, Sanjar Sheykhi, Ayob Productivity, Human Resources, Executive Organizations, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. Productividad, recursos humanos, organizaciones ejecutivas, administración, gestión administrativa This study aimed to identify the indicators of human resource productivity in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and the province of Boyer-Ahmad and to analyze their situation. This research is applied on purpose, descriptive-correlational in nature, using a survey research method. The statistical population was made up of all the employees of the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad (8,089 individuals), which according to the Cochran formula, the sample size was estimated at 366 individuals and the selection was based on a method of random grouping. To collect data, Goldsmith's (1980) employee productivity questionnaire was used. The experts confirmed the validity of the face and the content of the questionnaire, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was higher than 0.7, which shows the consistency between items and the confirmation of reliability. To examine the data, an exploratory factor analysis was performed using LISREL. According to the results, the data obtained was adequately adjusted with the factor structure of the indicator of productivity of human resources and the items of this indicator were consistent with the construction of the infrastructure. The results of the subscales showed that the indicators of motivation (89.34), ability (87.15) and credibility (80.05) were respectively in first to third place in terms of level of human resources of the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. In conclusion, it is suggested to emphasize the importance of competent and efficient human resources to improve organizational productivity and motivate human resources working in the executive organizations of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad to work more and be more efficient using material and spiritual incentives. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los indicadores de productividad de los recursos humanos en las organizaciones ejecutivas de Kohgiluyeh y la provincia de Boyer-Ahmad y analizar su situación. Esta investigación se aplica en propósito, de naturaleza descriptiva-correlacional, mediante un método de investigación por encuesta. La población estadística estuvo compuesta por todos los empleados de las organizaciones ejecutivas de Kohgiluyeh y Boyer-Ahmad (8.089 individuos), que según la fórmula de Cochran, el tamaño de la muestra se estimó en 366 individuos y la selección se basó en un método de agrupamiento aleatorio. Para recopilar datos, se utilizó el cuestionario de productividad de los empleados de Goldsmith (1980). Los expertos confirmaron la validez de la cara y el contenido del cuestionario, y el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach fue superior a 0.7, lo que muestra la consistencia entre ítems y la confirmación de la confiabilidad. Para examinar los datos, se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio utilizando LISREL. Según los resultados, los datos obtenidos se ajustaron adecuadamente con la estructura de factores del indicador de productividad de recursos humanos y los ítems de este indicador fueron consistentes con la construcción de la infraestructura. Los resultados de las subescalas mostraron que los indicadores de motivación (89.34), habilidad (87.15) y credibilidad (80.05) estaban respectivamente en el primer al tercer lugar en términos de nivel de recursos humanos de las organizaciones ejecutivas de Kohgiluyeh y Boyer-Ahmad. En conclusión, se sugiere enfatizar la importancia de los recursos humanos competentes y eficientes para mejorar la productividad organizacional y motivar a los recursos humanos que trabajan en las organizaciones ejecutivas de Kohgiluyeh y Boyer-Ahmad para trabajar más y ser más eficientes utilizando incentivos materiales y espirituales. Universidad Peruana Unión 2020-08-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/516 10.17162/au.v10i4.516 Apuntes Universitarios; Vol. 10 Núm. 4 (2020): Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios; 309 - 321 2304-0335 2225-7136 10.17162/au.v4i10 spa https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/516/609 https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/516/610 Derechos de autor 2020 Ali Shahabi Nasab, Alireza Manzari Tavakoli, Sanjar Salajegheh, Ayob Sheykhi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Productivity, Human Resources, Executive Organizations, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. Productividad, recursos humanos, organizaciones ejecutivas, administración, gestión administrativa Shahabi Nasab, Ali Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza Salajegheh, Sanjar Sheykhi, Ayob Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation |
| title | Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation |
| title_alt | Identificación de indicadores de productividad de recursos humanos en organizaciones ejecutivas y análisis de su situación |
| title_full | Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation |
| title_fullStr | Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation |
| title_short | Identifying Human Resources Productivity Indicators in Executive Organizations and Analyzing their Situation |
| title_sort | identifying human resources productivity indicators in executive organizations and analyzing their situation |
| topic | Productivity, Human Resources, Executive Organizations, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. Productividad, recursos humanos, organizaciones ejecutivas, administración, gestión administrativa |
| topic_facet | Productivity, Human Resources, Executive Organizations, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad. Productividad, recursos humanos, organizaciones ejecutivas, administración, gestión administrativa |
| url | https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/516 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shahabinasabali identifyinghumanresourcesproductivityindicatorsinexecutiveorganizationsandanalyzingtheirsituation AT manzaritavakolialireza identifyinghumanresourcesproductivityindicatorsinexecutiveorganizationsandanalyzingtheirsituation AT salajeghehsanjar identifyinghumanresourcesproductivityindicatorsinexecutiveorganizationsandanalyzingtheirsituation AT sheykhiayob identifyinghumanresourcesproductivityindicatorsinexecutiveorganizationsandanalyzingtheirsituation AT shahabinasabali identificaciondeindicadoresdeproductividadderecursoshumanosenorganizacionesejecutivasyanalisisdesusituacion AT manzaritavakolialireza identificaciondeindicadoresdeproductividadderecursoshumanosenorganizacionesejecutivasyanalisisdesusituacion AT salajeghehsanjar identificaciondeindicadoresdeproductividadderecursoshumanosenorganizacionesejecutivasyanalisisdesusituacion AT sheykhiayob identificaciondeindicadoresdeproductividadderecursoshumanosenorganizacionesejecutivasyanalisisdesusituacion |