The lost world of Genesis One ancient cosmology and the origins debate
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Libro |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Tabla de Contenidos:
- Genesis 1 is ancient cosmology
- Ancient cosmology is function oriented
- "Create" (Hebrew bara) concerns functions
- The beginning state in Genesis 1 is nonfunctional
- Days one to three in Genesis 1 establish functions
- Days four to six in Genesis 1 install functionaries
- Divine rest is in a temple
- The cosmos is a temple
- The seven days of Genesis 1 do not concern material origins
- "Functional cosmic temple" offers face-value exegesis
- Other theories of Genesis 1 either go too far or not far enough
- The difference between origin accounts in science and scripture is metaphysical in nature
- God´s roles as Creator and sustainer are less different than we have thought
- Current debate about Intelligent design ultimately concerns purpose
- Scientific explanations of origins can be viewed in light of purpose, and if so, are unobjectionable
- Resulting theology in this view of Genesis 1 is stronger, not weaker
- Public science education should be neutral regarding purpose.