Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nourah Almarri, Fabian Peralta, Jorge Silva, Estelle Page-Taylor, Arijit Ganguly, Eman Khalid, Bertrand Cailliau, José Manuel Morales‐Puebla, Luis Lassaletta
Formato: Artículo de revisión
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle)
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1881700513067565056
author Nourah Almarri
Fabian Peralta
Jorge Silva
Estelle Page-Taylor
Arijit Ganguly
Eman Khalid
Bertrand Cailliau
José Manuel Morales‐Puebla
Luis Lassaletta
author_browse Arijit Ganguly
Bertrand Cailliau
Eman Khalid
Estelle Page-Taylor
Fabian Peralta
Jorge Silva
José Manuel Morales‐Puebla
Luis Lassaletta
Nourah Almarri
author_facet Nourah Almarri
Fabian Peralta
Jorge Silva
Estelle Page-Taylor
Arijit Ganguly
Eman Khalid
Bertrand Cailliau
José Manuel Morales‐Puebla
Luis Lassaletta
author_sort Nourah Almarri
collection Producción científica
format Review
id openalex:W7169727368
institution UPeU
language English
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
record_format dspace
spelling openalex:W7169727368Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsNourah AlmarriFabian PeraltaJorge SilvaEstelle Page-TaylorArijit GangulyEman KhalidBertrand CailliauJosé Manuel Morales‐PueblaLuis Lassalettatonotopic mappingcochlear implant programmingspeech perception in noisemusic perceptionsound qualityadult cochlear implant recipientsHearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing Impairment and CommunicationSpeech and Audio ProcessingReviewhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10442-2W7169727368enEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology0937-44771434-47262026-07-19
spellingShingle tonotopic mapping
cochlear implant programming
speech perception in noise
music perception
sound quality
adult cochlear implant recipients
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Speech and Audio Processing
Nourah Almarri
Fabian Peralta
Jorge Silva
Estelle Page-Taylor
Arijit Ganguly
Eman Khalid
Bertrand Cailliau
José Manuel Morales‐Puebla
Luis Lassaletta
Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
title Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_full Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_fullStr Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_full_unstemmed Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_short Tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_sort tonotopic versus conventional frequency mapping in adult cochlear implant recipients a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized trials
topic tonotopic mapping
cochlear implant programming
speech perception in noise
music perception
sound quality
adult cochlear implant recipients
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Speech and Audio Processing
topic_facet tonotopic mapping
cochlear implant programming
speech perception in noise
music perception
sound quality
adult cochlear implant recipients
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Speech and Audio Processing
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10442-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nourahalmarri tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT fabianperalta tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT jorgesilva tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT estellepagetaylor tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT arijitganguly tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT emankhalid tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT bertrandcailliau tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT josemanuelmoralespuebla tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT luislassaletta tonotopicversusconventionalfrequencymappinginadultcochlearimplantrecipientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedtrials