Perspectivas de investigación y gestión de sociedades científicas de estudiantes de medicina peruanas

Objective: Describe the characteristics of organizational management, research activities, and perceived barriers of medical student scientific societies affiliated with SOCIMEP during the last quarter of 2024. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study involving the 41 SOCEMs affili...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Autores principales: Alvaro Micael Ñaña-Cordova, Frank Zela‐Coila, Mabel R. Challapa-Mamani, Stefani Laureano-Condori, Dina Vanesa Ito-Larico, Juan Huaccho-Rojas
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
medical students
research training
research output
organizational management
institutional support
research funding
scientific writing training
research methodology training
extracurricular research
Peru
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Innovations in Medical Education
Health Sciences Research and Education
Acceso en línea:Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle)
Descargar el archivo
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Sumario:Objective: Describe the characteristics of organizational management, research activities, and perceived barriers of medical student scientific societies affiliated with SOCIMEP during the last quarter of 2024. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study involving the 41 SOCEMs affiliated with SOCIMEP during the last quarter of 2024. A virtual survey was applied to their representatives, collecting data on organization, institutional support, academic activities, and scientific output. Descriptive analysis included absolute frequencies, means, and standard deviations. Results: Responses were obtained from 37 SOCEMs (90.2%). Of these, 64.86% had an advisory board and 91.89% collaborated with other SOCEMs. Only 18.92% received financial support. A total of 64.86% were conducting research projects and 54.05% had published in the last year. Individually, 66.67% of representatives had started extracurricular research, but only 33.33% published. Main needs identified were training in scientific writing (89.39%), research methodology (69.70%), and greater institutional and financial support. Conclusions: Peruvian SOCEMs show a high level of collaboration and interest in research, but face limitations in funding, mentoring, and scientific production. These gaps could affect their sustainability. It is a priority to strengthen their institutional structure, methodological training, and publication support to enhance the research training of medical students in Peru.

Ejemplares similares