Human and AI-generated feedback in higher education: A systematic review of effectiveness and student perceptions
This study aims to compare the feedback provided by human professors and ChatGPT on university students’ work and to report on students’ perceptions of both types of feedback. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases research included Web of Science, Scopus, EBSC...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo de revisión |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) Descargar el archivo |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares: Human and AI-generated feedback in higher education: A systematic review of effectiveness and student perceptions
- Comparison of Feedback from ChatGPT and Human Professors in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
- Translation into Spanish and validation of feedback in medical education questionnaire (FEEDME-Culture) during clinical rotations
- Application of artificial intelligence to measure attention levels in university students
- Nivel de uso marketing digital: Una perspectiva de los usuarios juliaqueños en tiempos de Covid-19
- The creation of feedback in training as a mobilizing factor for the cognitive activity of students
- Adaptación y análisis psicométrico de la Escala basada en el Modelo de la Aceptación de la tecnología a Chat GPT (TAME-CHATGPT) en estudiantes universitarios que hicieron uso de ChatGPT en Juliaca, 2024