The Problem of the of Authenticity of the Longer Ending of Mark
This article raises the question of the authenticity of the longer ending of Mark (16:9-20). Both external and internal evidence are evaluated to determine whether or not the longer ending is from the autograph. External evidence includes manuscripts, early editions, and patristic citations. The int...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Revista Theologika |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | This article raises the question of the authenticity of the longer ending of Mark (16:9-20). Both external and internal evidence are evaluated to determine whether or not the longer ending is from the autograph. External evidence includes manuscripts, early editions, and patristic citations. The internal evidence includes the analysis of the theological and literary coherence of Mark 16:9-20 in relation to the rest of the gospel and a statistical analysis that compares the use of hapax legomena in Mark in general with the use of these in the disputed portion. It is concluded that the longer ending of Mark was probably not written by the same author of the gospel. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2413-2470 1022-5390 |