Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation
Universal legal justification attempts to provide a third alternative to the Reformed-Arminian debate over the nature and extent of salvation. This article summarizes some of the most important arguments used by the proponents of universal legal justification to support their theology and provides a...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Revista Theologika |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695181845037056 |
|---|---|
| author | Rodríguez, Ángel Manuel Rodríguez, Roy E |
| author_browse | Rodríguez, Roy E Rodríguez, Ángel Manuel |
| author_facet | Rodríguez, Ángel Manuel Rodríguez, Roy E |
| author_sort | Rodríguez, Ángel Manuel |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Revista Theologika |
| description | Universal legal justification attempts to provide a third alternative to the Reformed-Arminian debate over the nature and extent of salvation. This article summarizes some of the most important arguments used by the proponents of universal legal justification to support their theology and provides an evaluation of its view, demonstrating that it does not really provide a third alternative to Arminianism and Calvinism. Further, assuming universal legal justification implies that there is hardly any room left for Christ’s work of mediation before the Father in heaven. Finally, universal legal justification’s interpretation of the Pauline phrases “in Adam” and “in Christ,” as well as its understanding of substitution in connection with the use of the "in Christ"motif, is problematic. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:theologika.upeu.edu.pe:article/1674 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2413-2470 1022-5390 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Revista Theologika |
| spelling | oai:theologika.upeu.edu.pe:article/16742022-03-12T08:06:18Z Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation Rodríguez, Ángel Manuel Rodríguez, Roy E Universal legal justification, Arminianism, Calvinism, soteriology, substitution Justificación legal universal, arminianismo, calvinismo, soteriología, sustitución Universal legal justification attempts to provide a third alternative to the Reformed-Arminian debate over the nature and extent of salvation. This article summarizes some of the most important arguments used by the proponents of universal legal justification to support their theology and provides an evaluation of its view, demonstrating that it does not really provide a third alternative to Arminianism and Calvinism. Further, assuming universal legal justification implies that there is hardly any room left for Christ’s work of mediation before the Father in heaven. Finally, universal legal justification’s interpretation of the Pauline phrases “in Adam” and “in Christ,” as well as its understanding of substitution in connection with the use of the "in Christ"motif, is problematic. La justificación legal universal intenta proporcionar una tercera alternativa al debate reformado-arminiano sobre la naturaleza y el alcance de la salvación. Este artículo resume algunos de los argumentos más importantes utilizados por los defensores de la justificación legal universal para apoyar su teología y proporciona una evaluación de su punto de vista, demostrando que en realidad no ofrece una tercera alternativa al arminianismo y al calvinismo. Además, asumir la justificación legal universal implica que casi no queda lugar para la obra de mediación de Cristo ante el Padre en el cielo. Finalmente, la interpretación de la justificación legal universal de las frases paulinas “en Adán” y “en Cristo”, así como su comprensión de la sustitución en relación con el uso del motivo “en Cristo”, es problemática. Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión 2021-12-29 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1674 10.17162/rt.v36i2.1674 Theologika; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Revista Theologika; 160-170 Revista Theologika; Vol. 36 Núm. 2 (2021): Revista Theologika; 160-170 2413-2470 1022-5390 10.17162/rt.v36i2 spa https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1674/1945 Derechos de autor 2022 Ángel Manuel Rodríguez |
| spellingShingle | Universal legal justification, Arminianism, Calvinism, soteriology, substitution Justificación legal universal, arminianismo, calvinismo, soteriología, sustitución Rodríguez, Ángel Manuel Rodríguez, Roy E Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation |
| title | Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation |
| title_full | Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation |
| title_short | Universal Legal Justification: Brief Description and Evaluation |
| title_sort | universal legal justification brief description and evaluation |
| topic | Universal legal justification, Arminianism, Calvinism, soteriology, substitution Justificación legal universal, arminianismo, calvinismo, soteriología, sustitución |
| topic_facet | Universal legal justification, Arminianism, Calvinism, soteriology, substitution Justificación legal universal, arminianismo, calvinismo, soteriología, sustitución |
| url | https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1674 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezangelmanuel universallegaljustificationbriefdescriptionandevaluation AT rodriguezroye universallegaljustificationbriefdescriptionandevaluation |