The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II
Throughout the history of Seventh-day Adventists, the investigative (or pre-advent) judgment has been one of the most controversial doctrines, challenged and questioned more than any other Adventist belief. This paper explores the reasons critics of Adventism, and particularly Albion Fox Ballenger,...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Revista Theologika |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695180563677184 |
|---|---|
| author | Jankiewicz, Darius W. |
| author_browse | Jankiewicz, Darius W. |
| author_facet | Jankiewicz, Darius W. |
| author_sort | Jankiewicz, Darius W. |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Revista Theologika |
| description | Throughout the history of Seventh-day Adventists, the investigative (or pre-advent) judgment has been one of the most controversial doctrines, challenged and questioned more than any other Adventist belief. This paper explores the reasons critics of Adventism, and particularly Albion Fox Ballenger, object to the doctrine of the investigative judgment. Ballenger was an ex-Adventist minister and one of the strongest critics of Adventist doctrine of the sanctuary during the first part of the 20th century. All other criticism of the doctrine, and particularly of the investigative judgment, go back to Ballenger. This paper is the second of a two-part series on the investigative judgment. The first part offered an abridged exposition of Ballenger’s soteriology and his critique of the investigative judgment doctrine. This second part concludes with a theological analysis of the critique of the doctrine advanced by Ballenger and his evangelical followers in the context a broader understanding of Protestant soteriology. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:theologika.upeu.edu.pe:article/1444 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2413-2470 1022-5390 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Revista Theologika |
| spelling | oai:theologika.upeu.edu.pe:article/14442021-03-29T19:02:57Z The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II Jankiewicz, Darius W. Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo Throughout the history of Seventh-day Adventists, the investigative (or pre-advent) judgment has been one of the most controversial doctrines, challenged and questioned more than any other Adventist belief. This paper explores the reasons critics of Adventism, and particularly Albion Fox Ballenger, object to the doctrine of the investigative judgment. Ballenger was an ex-Adventist minister and one of the strongest critics of Adventist doctrine of the sanctuary during the first part of the 20th century. All other criticism of the doctrine, and particularly of the investigative judgment, go back to Ballenger. This paper is the second of a two-part series on the investigative judgment. The first part offered an abridged exposition of Ballenger’s soteriology and his critique of the investigative judgment doctrine. This second part concludes with a theological analysis of the critique of the doctrine advanced by Ballenger and his evangelical followers in the context a broader understanding of Protestant soteriology. A lo largo de la historia de los adventistas del séptimo día, el juicio investigador (o juicio pre advenimiento) ha sido una de las doctrinas más controvertidas, desafiada y cuestionada más que cualquier otra creencia adventista. Este trabajo explora las razones por las que los críticos del adventismo, y en particular Albion Fox Ballenger, objetan la doctrina del juicio investigador. Ballenger fue un ministro adventista que se convirtió en uno de los críticos más fuertes de la doctrina adventista del santuario durante la primera parte del siglo XX. Todas las demás críticas a la doctrina, y en particular al juicio investigador, se remontan a Ballenger. Este artículo es la segunda parte de una serie de dos sobre el juicio investigador. La primera parte ofreció una exposición abreviada de la soteriología de Ballenger y su crítica de la doctrina del juicio investigador. Esta segunda parte concluye con un análisis teológico de la crítica de la doctrina propuesta por Ballenger y sus seguidores evangélicos en el contexto de una comprensión más amplia de la soteriología protestante. Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión 2020-12-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1444 10.17162/rt.v35i2.1444 Theologika; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2020): Revista Theologika; 102-123 Revista Theologika; Vol. 35 Núm. 2 (2020): Revista Theologika; 102-123 2413-2470 1022-5390 10.17162/rt.v35i2 spa https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1444/1825 Derechos de autor 2021 Roy E Graf Maiorov |
| spellingShingle | Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo Jankiewicz, Darius W. The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II |
| title | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II |
| title_full | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II |
| title_fullStr | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II |
| title_short | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part II |
| title_sort | theological necessity of the investigative judgment albion ballenger and his failed quest to subvert the doctrine part ii |
| topic | Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo |
| topic_facet | Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo |
| url | https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1444 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jankiewiczdariusw thetheologicalnecessityoftheinvestigativejudgmentalbionballengerandhisfailedquesttosubvertthedoctrinepartii AT jankiewiczdariusw theologicalnecessityoftheinvestigativejudgmentalbionballengerandhisfailedquesttosubvertthedoctrinepartii |