The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I
Throughout the history of Seventh-day Adventists, the investigative (or pre-advent) judgment has been one of the most controversial doctrines, challenged and questioned more than any other Adventist belief. This paper explores the reasons critics of Adventism, and particularly Albion Fox Ballenger,...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Revista Theologika |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695179975426048 |
|---|---|
| author | W. Jankiewicz, Darius W. Jankiewicz, Darius |
| author_browse | W. Jankiewicz, Darius |
| author_facet | W. Jankiewicz, Darius W. Jankiewicz, Darius |
| author_sort | W. Jankiewicz, Darius |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Revista Theologika |
| description | Throughout the history of Seventh-day Adventists, the investigative (or pre-advent) judgment has been one of the most controversial doctrines, challenged and questioned more than any other Adventist belief. This paper explores the reasons critics of Adventism, and particularly Albion Fox Ballenger, object to the doctrine of the investigative judgement. Ballenger was an ex-Adventist minister and one of the strongest critics of Adventist doctrine of the sanctuary during the first part of the 20th century. All other criticism of the doctrine, and particularly of the investigative judgment, go back to Ballenger. This paper is the first of a two-part series on the investigative judgment. The first part offers an abridged exposition of Ballenger’s soteriology and his critique of the investigative judgment doctrine. The second article will conclude with a theological analysis of the critique of the doctrine advanced by Ballenger and his evangelical followers in the context a broader understanding of Protestant soteriology. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:theologika.upeu.edu.pe:article/1370 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2413-2470 1022-5390 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Revista Theologika |
| spelling | oai:theologika.upeu.edu.pe:article/13702021-02-25T22:27:59Z The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I W. Jankiewicz, Darius W. Jankiewicz, Darius Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo Throughout the history of Seventh-day Adventists, the investigative (or pre-advent) judgment has been one of the most controversial doctrines, challenged and questioned more than any other Adventist belief. This paper explores the reasons critics of Adventism, and particularly Albion Fox Ballenger, object to the doctrine of the investigative judgement. Ballenger was an ex-Adventist minister and one of the strongest critics of Adventist doctrine of the sanctuary during the first part of the 20th century. All other criticism of the doctrine, and particularly of the investigative judgment, go back to Ballenger. This paper is the first of a two-part series on the investigative judgment. The first part offers an abridged exposition of Ballenger’s soteriology and his critique of the investigative judgment doctrine. The second article will conclude with a theological analysis of the critique of the doctrine advanced by Ballenger and his evangelical followers in the context a broader understanding of Protestant soteriology. A lo largo de la historia de los adventistas del séptimo día, el juicio investigador (o juicio pre advenimiento)ha sido una de las doctrinas más controvertidas, desafiada y cuestionada más que cualquier otra creencia adventista. Este artículo explora las razones por las que los críticos del adventismo, y en particular Albion Fox Ballenger, objetan la doctrina del juicio investigador. Ballenger fue un ministro adventista que se convirtió en uno de los críticos más fuertes de la doctrina adventista del santuario durante la primera parte del siglo XX. Todas las demás críticas a la doctrina, y en particular al juicio investigador, se remontan a Ballenger. Este artículo es la primera parte de una serie de dos sobre el juicio investigador. La primera parte ofrece una exposición abreviada de la soteriología de Ballenger y su crítica de la doctrina del juicio investigador. Elsegundo artículo concluirá con un análisis teológico de la crítica de la doctrina propuesta por Ballenger y sus seguidores evangélicos en el contexto de una comprensión más amplia de la soteriología protestante. Facultad de Teología de la Universidad Peruana Unión 2020-07-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1370 10.17162/rt.v35i1.1370 Theologika; Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Revista Theologika; 24-47 Revista Theologika; Vol. 35 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Theologika; 24-47 2413-2470 1022-5390 10.17162/rt.v35i1 spa https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1370/1707 Derechos de autor 2020 Darius W. Janckiewicz |
| spellingShingle | Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo W. Jankiewicz, Darius W. Jankiewicz, Darius The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title_alt | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title_full | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title_fullStr | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title_short | The Theological Necessity of the Investigative Judgment: Albion Ballenger and His Failed Quest to Subvert the Doctrine—Part I |
| title_sort | theological necessity of the investigative judgment albion ballenger and his failed quest to subvert the doctrine part i |
| topic | Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo |
| topic_facet | Albion Ballenger, investigative judgment, soteriology, monergism, synergism Albion Ballenger, juicio investigador, soteriología, monergismo, sinergismo |
| url | https://theologika.upeu.edu.pe/r_theologika/article/view/1370 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wjankiewiczdarius thetheologicalnecessityoftheinvestigativejudgmentalbionballengerandhisfailedquesttosubvertthedoctrineparti AT wjankiewiczdarius thetheologicalnecessityoftheinvestigativejudgmentalbionballengerandhisfailedquesttosubvertthedoctrineparti AT wjankiewiczdarius theologicalnecessityoftheinvestigativejudgmentalbionballengerandhisfailedquesttosubvertthedoctrineparti AT wjankiewiczdarius theologicalnecessityoftheinvestigativejudgmentalbionballengerandhisfailedquesttosubvertthedoctrineparti |