Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020

The objective of this research study is to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of the Psychological Empowerment Scale instrument through an exploratory analysis. The instrument, created by Spreitzer (1995), adapted into Spanish by Albar, García-Ramírez, López and Garrido (2012), measur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Revista de Investigación Valor Agregado
Autores principales: Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi, Rojas Mamani, Cinthia Gemally, Jarama Soto, Ricardo Elias
Formato: Artículo de revista
Lenguaje:español
Publicado: Universidad Peruana Unión 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver en el sistema de origen
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1881695122634047488
author Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi
Rojas Mamani, Cinthia Gemally
Jarama Soto, Ricardo Elias
author_browse Jarama Soto, Ricardo Elias
Rojas Mamani, Cinthia Gemally
Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi
author_facet Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi
Rojas Mamani, Cinthia Gemally
Jarama Soto, Ricardo Elias
author_sort Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi
collection Revistas
container_title Revista de Investigación Valor Agregado
description The objective of this research study is to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of the Psychological Empowerment Scale instrument through an exploratory analysis. The instrument, created by Spreitzer (1995), adapted into Spanish by Albar, García-Ramírez, López and Garrido (2012), measures the dimensions of meaning, competence, self-determination and impact using 12 items. The previous internal consistency analyses found a Cronbach's Alpha for the whole instrument of a=0.855 and 0.875, 0.858, 0.782, 0.786 for each of the dimensions. To verify the homogeneity of the variables, KMO was first measured, obtaining an acceptable Kaiser Meyer Olkin index of 0.794 and a Chi square of 1012,366 with 66 degrees of freedom and significance level = 0.000 ( p <.001) using the Bartlett sphericity test, as a requirement for the extraction of factors using rotated components, obtaining loads for the first factor between 0.832 and 0.849; for the second factor, between 0.868 and 0.883, for the third factor, between 0.773 and 0.851 and for the fourth factor, between 0.404 and 0.926, showing evidence of a high correlation, because they are greater than 0.4, meeting the objective of seeing if they group empirically, as theoretically predicted. However, item COMP 4 (0.574, 0.328) did not obtain a load in its dimensionality and items AUT 9 (0.405), IMP 10 (0.404) and IMP 12 (0.346) obtained additional loads in other factors, which could be eliminated, but they were left in their theoretical factors, waiting for a confirmatory analysis, since their first phase results suggest their reliability.
format Online
id oai:riva.upeu.edu.pe:article/1411
institution UPeU
issn 2413-5836
2410-1168
language Spanish
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Universidad Peruana Unión
publisherStr Universidad Peruana Unión
record_format ojs
revista_str_mv Revista de Investigación Valor Agregado
spelling oai:riva.upeu.edu.pe:article/14112022-11-05T20:32:36Z Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020 Validación del instrumento psychological empowerment “EP” en trabajadores de la empresa call center Atento, Lima, 2020 Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi Rojas Mamani, Cinthia Gemally Jarama Soto, Ricardo Elias Empowerment; consistencia interna; componentes rotados; análisis factorial Empowerment; internal consistency; rotated components; factorial analysis The objective of this research study is to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of the Psychological Empowerment Scale instrument through an exploratory analysis. The instrument, created by Spreitzer (1995), adapted into Spanish by Albar, García-Ramírez, López and Garrido (2012), measures the dimensions of meaning, competence, self-determination and impact using 12 items. The previous internal consistency analyses found a Cronbach's Alpha for the whole instrument of a=0.855 and 0.875, 0.858, 0.782, 0.786 for each of the dimensions. To verify the homogeneity of the variables, KMO was first measured, obtaining an acceptable Kaiser Meyer Olkin index of 0.794 and a Chi square of 1012,366 with 66 degrees of freedom and significance level = 0.000 ( p <.001) using the Bartlett sphericity test, as a requirement for the extraction of factors using rotated components, obtaining loads for the first factor between 0.832 and 0.849; for the second factor, between 0.868 and 0.883, for the third factor, between 0.773 and 0.851 and for the fourth factor, between 0.404 and 0.926, showing evidence of a high correlation, because they are greater than 0.4, meeting the objective of seeing if they group empirically, as theoretically predicted. However, item COMP 4 (0.574, 0.328) did not obtain a load in its dimensionality and items AUT 9 (0.405), IMP 10 (0.404) and IMP 12 (0.346) obtained additional loads in other factors, which could be eliminated, but they were left in their theoretical factors, waiting for a confirmatory analysis, since their first phase results suggest their reliability. El objetivo de este trabajo de investigación es evaluar la consistencia interna y confiabilidad del instrumento Scale Psychological Empowerment mediante un análisis exploratorio. El instrumento creado por Spreitzer (1995), adaptado al español por Albar, García-Ramírez, López, & Garrido (2012), mide las dimensiones significado, competencia, autodeterminación e impacto mediante 12 reactivos. Los análisis previos de consistencia interna, se encontró un Alpha de Cronbach para el total de instrumento a=0.855 y 0.875, 0.858, 0.782, 0.786 para cada una de las dimensiones. Para verificar la homogeneidad de las variables (reactivos), previamente se realizaron las estimaciones mediante KMO, obteniendo un índice de Káiser Meyer Olkin aceptable de 0.794 y un Chi cuadrado de 1012,366 con 66 grados de libertad y nivel de significancia =0.000 (p<.001) mediante la prueba de esfericidad de Bartlett, como requisito para la extracción de factores mediante componente rotados, obteniéndose para el primer factor cargas entre 0.832 y 0.849; para el segundo factor, entre 0.868 y 0.883, para el tercer factor, entre 0.773 y 0.851 y para el cuarto factor, entre 0.404 y 0.926, demostrando evidencia de una alta correlación, porque son mayores a 0.4, cumpliendo el objetivo de ver si se agrupan empíricamente, tal como, teóricamente se había predicho. Sin embargo, el reactivo COMP 4 (0.574, 0.328) no obtuvo carga en su dimensionalidad y los reactivos AUT 9 (0.405), IMP 10 (0.404) e IMP 12 (0.346) obtuvieron cargas adicionales en otros factores, pudiendo ser eliminados, se decidió mantenerlos en su factor teórico, esperando un análisis confirmatorio, siendo que en la primera fase que obtuvieron estimaciones que demuestran su confiabilidad. Universidad Peruana Unión 2020-12-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://riva.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/ri_va/article/view/1411 10.17162/riva.v7i1.1411 Revista de Investigación Valor Agregado; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Científica Valor agregado; 1- 10 2413-5836 2410-1168 10.17162/riva.v7i1 spa https://riva.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/ri_va/article/view/1411/1781 https://riva.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/ri_va/article/view/1411/2011 Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Investigación Valor Agregado
spellingShingle Empowerment; consistencia interna; componentes rotados; análisis factorial
Empowerment; internal consistency; rotated components; factorial analysis
Yapias Rivera, Dianna Jheydi
Rojas Mamani, Cinthia Gemally
Jarama Soto, Ricardo Elias
Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020
title Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020
title_alt Validación del instrumento psychological empowerment “EP” en trabajadores de la empresa call center Atento, Lima, 2020
title_full Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020
title_fullStr Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020
title_short Validation of the "EP" psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the Atento call center company, Lima, 2020
title_sort validation of the ep psychological empowerment instrument in workers at the atento call center company lima 2020
topic Empowerment; consistencia interna; componentes rotados; análisis factorial
Empowerment; internal consistency; rotated components; factorial analysis
topic_facet Empowerment; consistencia interna; componentes rotados; análisis factorial
Empowerment; internal consistency; rotated components; factorial analysis
url https://riva.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/ri_va/article/view/1411
work_keys_str_mv AT yapiasriveradiannajheydi validationoftheeppsychologicalempowermentinstrumentinworkersattheatentocallcentercompanylima2020
AT rojasmamanicinthiagemally validationoftheeppsychologicalempowermentinstrumentinworkersattheatentocallcentercompanylima2020
AT jaramasotoricardoelias validationoftheeppsychologicalempowermentinstrumentinworkersattheatentocallcentercompanylima2020
AT yapiasriveradiannajheydi validaciondelinstrumentopsychologicalempowermentepentrabajadoresdelaempresacallcenteratentolima2020
AT rojasmamanicinthiagemally validaciondelinstrumentopsychologicalempowermentepentrabajadoresdelaempresacallcenteratentolima2020
AT jaramasotoricardoelias validaciondelinstrumentopsychologicalempowermentepentrabajadoresdelaempresacallcenteratentolima2020