Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls
Under the strong influence of the dominant Kantian legacy in much of the twentieth century ethics, Rawls designs a theory of justice whose highest aspiration is to be impartial, whereby theory attempts to refute the two dominant ethical currents in his time : utilitarianism and intuitionism. The neo...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Apuntes Universitarios |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo de revista |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Peruana Unión
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881695012066951168 |
|---|---|
| author | Aranda Fraga, Fernando |
| author_browse | Aranda Fraga, Fernando |
| author_facet | Aranda Fraga, Fernando |
| author_sort | Aranda Fraga, Fernando |
| collection | Revistas |
| container_title | Apuntes Universitarios |
| description | Under the strong influence of the dominant Kantian legacy in much of the twentieth century ethics, Rawls designs a theory of justice whose highest aspiration is to be impartial, whereby theory attempts to refute the two dominant ethical currents in his time : utilitarianism and intuitionism. The neocontractualism of John Rawls arises in the spectrum of contemporary political philosophy as a broad-based liberalism, whose main purpose is to provide a pluralistic framework, capable of regulating the delivery of justice in a well ordered society. In Rawls, the priority of the right over the good would be signaling a willingness to take a choice of ethics and justice and concurrent broad but lacking in substantive moral theory, in the spirit of an era devoid of anthropological content able to properly explain human and social reality. |
| format | Online |
| id | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/294 |
| institution | UPeU |
| issn | 2304-0335 2225-7136 |
| language | Spanish |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateRange | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| publisherStr | Universidad Peruana Unión |
| record_format | ojs |
| revista_str_mv | Apuntes Universitarios |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe:article/2942020-06-17T13:17:13Z Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls Evaluación crítica de la teoría de la justicia de John Rawls - Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls Aranda Fraga, Fernando Rawls, justice, fairness, liberalism, contractualism, consensus rawls justicia imparcialidad liberalismo contractualismo consenso Under the strong influence of the dominant Kantian legacy in much of the twentieth century ethics, Rawls designs a theory of justice whose highest aspiration is to be impartial, whereby theory attempts to refute the two dominant ethical currents in his time : utilitarianism and intuitionism. The neocontractualism of John Rawls arises in the spectrum of contemporary political philosophy as a broad-based liberalism, whose main purpose is to provide a pluralistic framework, capable of regulating the delivery of justice in a well ordered society. In Rawls, the priority of the right over the good would be signaling a willingness to take a choice of ethics and justice and concurrent broad but lacking in substantive moral theory, in the spirit of an era devoid of anthropological content able to properly explain human and social reality. Bajo una fuerte influencia de la herencia kantiana, predominante en gran parte de la ética del siglo XX, Rawls diseña una teoría de la justicia cuya máxima pretensión es la de ser imparcial, teoría mediante la cual intenta refutar a las dos corrientes éticas predominantes en su tiempo: utilitarismo e intuicionismo. El neocontractualismo de John Rawls surge en el espectro de la filosofía política contemporánea como un liberalismo de base amplia, cuya principal finalidad es brindar un marco pluralista, capaz de regular la impartición de justicia en una sociedad bien ordenada. En la concepción rawlsiana, la prioridad de lo justo sobre lo bueno estaría denotando una voluntad de asumir una opción de la ética y de la justicia amplia y concurrente, pero carente de teoría moral sustantiva, acorde con el espíritu de una época vacía de contenidos antropológicos capaces de explicar con propiedad la realidad humana y social. Universidad Peruana Unión 2013-07-14 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/294 10.17162/au.v0i1.294 Apuntes Universitarios; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2013): Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios; 69-104 2304-0335 2225-7136 10.17162/au.v0i1 spa https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/294/pdf 10.17162/au.v0i1.294.g290 Derechos de autor 2013 Fernando Aranda Fraga |
| spellingShingle | Rawls, justice, fairness, liberalism, contractualism, consensus rawls justicia imparcialidad liberalismo contractualismo consenso Aranda Fraga, Fernando Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title | Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title_alt | Evaluación crítica de la teoría de la justicia de John Rawls - Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title_full | Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title_fullStr | Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title_short | Critical evaluation of the theory of justice of John Rawls |
| title_sort | critical evaluation of the theory of justice of john rawls |
| topic | Rawls, justice, fairness, liberalism, contractualism, consensus rawls justicia imparcialidad liberalismo contractualismo consenso |
| topic_facet | Rawls, justice, fairness, liberalism, contractualism, consensus rawls justicia imparcialidad liberalismo contractualismo consenso |
| url | https://apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe/index.php/revapuntes/article/view/294 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arandafragafernando criticalevaluationofthetheoryofjusticeofjohnrawls AT arandafragafernando evaluacioncriticadelateoriadelajusticiadejohnrawlscriticalevaluationofthetheoryofjusticeofjohnrawls |