Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background Despite significant advancements in closing the global gender gap, there is still much progress to be made, particularly in the field of science and scientific research. Numerous studies have addressed this issue and identified a variety of factors that contribute to gender asymmetries in...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Revisión por pares |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881508985970884608 |
|---|---|
| author | Huancahuire Vega, Salomon |
| author_browse | Huancahuire Vega, Salomon |
| author_facet | Huancahuire Vega, Salomon |
| author_sort | Huancahuire Vega, Salomon |
| collection | Producción científica |
| description | Background Despite significant advancements in closing the global gender gap, there is still much progress to be made, particularly in the field of science and scientific research. Numerous studies have addressed this issue and identified a variety of factors that contribute to gender asymmetries in research. Methods This study aimed to identify the determinants of gender gaps in scientific research present in the most cited studies of the past ten years as a first step towards closing these differences. Through a systematic literature review that incorporated the Proknow-C Knowledge Development Process and Constructivism methodology. Results The results lead us to identify four dimensions to classify the determinants of the gaps in scientific research: academic supply, research policies, scientific production and researcher profile with their respective quantitative or qualitative indicators. Conclusions As a potential basis for further modeling that offers greater analytical and correlational depth, as well as the identification of targeted strategies aimed at reducing gender gaps in research. |
| format | Peer review |
| id | oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/361 |
| institution | UPeU |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/3612026-11-02T21:24:28ZReferee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]Huancahuire Vega, SalomonGender gapsdiscriminationsegregationresearchBackground Despite significant advancements in closing the global gender gap, there is still much progress to be made, particularly in the field of science and scientific research. Numerous studies have addressed this issue and identified a variety of factors that contribute to gender asymmetries in research. Methods This study aimed to identify the determinants of gender gaps in scientific research present in the most cited studies of the past ten years as a first step towards closing these differences. Through a systematic literature review that incorporated the Proknow-C Knowledge Development Process and Constructivism methodology. Results The results lead us to identify four dimensions to classify the determinants of the gaps in scientific research: academic supply, research policies, scientific production and researcher profile with their respective quantitative or qualitative indicators. Conclusions As a potential basis for further modeling that offers greater analytical and correlational depth, as well as the identification of targeted strategies aimed at reducing gender gaps in research.Peer reviewhttps://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162708.r21519610.5256/f1000research.162708.r215196https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/361W4416663684en2024-01-012026-06-13T08:11:44Z2026-06-13T08:11:44Z |
| spellingShingle | Gender gaps discrimination segregation research Huancahuire Vega, Salomon Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title | Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_full | Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_fullStr | Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_short | Referee report. For: Gender gaps in research: a systematic review [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] |
| title_sort | referee report for gender gaps in research a systematic review version 3 peer review 1 approved 2 approved with reservations |
| topic | Gender gaps discrimination segregation research |
| topic_facet | Gender gaps discrimination segregation research |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162708.r215196 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/361 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT huancahuirevegasalomon refereereportforgendergapsinresearchasystematicreviewversion3peerreview1approved2approvedwithreservations |