Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP)
The study’s objective was to design and validate a motivation scale for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP). Instrumental research where a scale of 13 items distributed in 2 factors (Intentional State and Commitment-will) was designed and validated. The sample compri...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881508937011822592 |
|---|---|
| author | Carranza Esteban, Renzo Felipe Mamani Benito, Oscar Javier Huancahuire Vega, Salomon Casildo Bedon, Nancy Esther Cabrera-Orosco, Isabel Turpo Chaparro, Josue Edison |
| author_browse | Cabrera-Orosco, Isabel Carranza Esteban, Renzo Felipe Casildo Bedon, Nancy Esther Huancahuire Vega, Salomon Mamani Benito, Oscar Javier Turpo Chaparro, Josue Edison |
| author_facet | Carranza Esteban, Renzo Felipe Mamani Benito, Oscar Javier Huancahuire Vega, Salomon Casildo Bedon, Nancy Esther Cabrera-Orosco, Isabel Turpo Chaparro, Josue Edison |
| author_sort | Carranza Esteban, Renzo Felipe |
| collection | Producción científica |
| description | The study’s objective was to design and validate a motivation scale for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP). Instrumental research where a scale of 13 items distributed in 2 factors (Intentional State and Commitment-will) was designed and validated. The sample comprised 546 university professors (62.1% male) aged 22 to 67 ( M = 45.05 and DS = 9.32). The sample was separated into two subgroups for the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. For analyzing the validity of evidence based on the content, the Aiken V coefficient was used; for construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used. Reliability was studied through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The results show that the items received a favorable evaluation (Aiken’s V > 0.70). Goodness of fit indices were adequate (IFC = 0.93, TLI = 0.92, and RMSEA = 0.08). Likewise, the correlation between factors 1 and 2 was significant ( p < 0.05). Evidence of validity based on the relationship with other variables with measures of professional self-efficacy is significant and acceptable reliability ( α = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.89–0.92). In conclusion, the MoSCPU-UP scale is an instrument that reports evidence of validity and reliability. |
| format | Article |
| id | oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/353 |
| institution | UPeU |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/3532026-11-02T12:57:04ZDesign and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP)Carranza Esteban, Renzo FelipeMamani Benito, Oscar JavierHuancahuire Vega, SalomonCasildo Bedon, Nancy EstherCabrera-Orosco, IsabelTurpo Chaparro, Josue Edisonmotivationscientific publicationuniversity professorsvalidityreliabilityPeruThe study’s objective was to design and validate a motivation scale for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP). Instrumental research where a scale of 13 items distributed in 2 factors (Intentional State and Commitment-will) was designed and validated. The sample comprised 546 university professors (62.1% male) aged 22 to 67 ( M = 45.05 and DS = 9.32). The sample was separated into two subgroups for the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. For analyzing the validity of evidence based on the content, the Aiken V coefficient was used; for construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used. Reliability was studied through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The results show that the items received a favorable evaluation (Aiken’s V > 0.70). Goodness of fit indices were adequate (IFC = 0.93, TLI = 0.92, and RMSEA = 0.08). Likewise, the correlation between factors 1 and 2 was significant ( p < 0.05). Evidence of validity based on the relationship with other variables with measures of professional self-efficacy is significant and acceptable reliability ( α = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.89–0.92). In conclusion, the MoSCPU-UP scale is an instrument that reports evidence of validity and reliability.Articlehttps://public-pages-files-2025.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378626/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.137862610.3389/feduc.2024.1378626https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/353W4402285479enFrontiers in Education2504-284X2024-09-052026-06-13T08:11:32Z2026-06-13T08:11:32Z |
| spellingShingle | motivation scientific publication university professors validity reliability Peru Carranza Esteban, Renzo Felipe Mamani Benito, Oscar Javier Huancahuire Vega, Salomon Casildo Bedon, Nancy Esther Cabrera-Orosco, Isabel Turpo Chaparro, Josue Edison Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP) |
| title | Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP) |
| title_full | Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP) |
| title_fullStr | Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP) |
| title_short | Design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in Peruvian university professors (MoSCPU-UP) |
| title_sort | design and validation of a scale of motivation for scientific publication in peruvian university professors moscpu up |
| topic | motivation scientific publication university professors validity reliability Peru |
| topic_facet | motivation scientific publication university professors validity reliability Peru |
| url | https://public-pages-files-2025.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378626/pdf https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378626 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/353 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carranzaestebanrenzofelipe designandvalidationofascaleofmotivationforscientificpublicationinperuvianuniversityprofessorsmoscpuup AT mamanibenitooscarjavier designandvalidationofascaleofmotivationforscientificpublicationinperuvianuniversityprofessorsmoscpuup AT huancahuirevegasalomon designandvalidationofascaleofmotivationforscientificpublicationinperuvianuniversityprofessorsmoscpuup AT casildobedonnancyesther designandvalidationofascaleofmotivationforscientificpublicationinperuvianuniversityprofessorsmoscpuup AT cabreraoroscoisabel designandvalidationofascaleofmotivationforscientificpublicationinperuvianuniversityprofessorsmoscpuup AT turpochaparrojosueedison designandvalidationofascaleofmotivationforscientificpublicationinperuvianuniversityprofessorsmoscpuup |