The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: In neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may be more beneficial compared to endotracheal intubation (ETI). We evaluated the efficacy of CPAP in neonates with MAS. Methods: Four engines were used to search randomized clinical trials (...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J., Hilario-Gomez, Maryori M., Diaz Reyes, Nelson Fidel, Caballero-Alvarado, José A., Barboza, Joshuan J.
Formato: Artículo de revisión
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver en el sistema de origen
Ver en el sistema de origen
Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle)
Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle)
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1881508946977488896
author Toro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J.
Hilario-Gomez, Maryori M.
Diaz Reyes, Nelson Fidel
Caballero-Alvarado, José A.
Barboza, Joshuan J.
author_browse Barboza, Joshuan J.
Caballero-Alvarado, José A.
Diaz Reyes, Nelson Fidel
Hilario-Gomez, Maryori M.
Toro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J.
author_facet Toro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J.
Hilario-Gomez, Maryori M.
Diaz Reyes, Nelson Fidel
Caballero-Alvarado, José A.
Barboza, Joshuan J.
author_sort Toro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J.
collection Producción científica
description Background: In neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may be more beneficial compared to endotracheal intubation (ETI). We evaluated the efficacy of CPAP in neonates with MAS. Methods: Four engines were used to search randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We used relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to assess the effect on dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. In addition, we used the Paule–Mandel (PM) random effects model due to the anticipated lack of events. Results: Three RCTs were included (n = 432). No significant difference was found in mortality (RR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.54–1.25; I2 = 71%; p = 0.36), need for ventilation (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.15–1.56; I2 = 71%; p = 0.57), and incidence of pneumothorax (RR = 1.24; 95%CI = 0.30–5.12; I2 = 0%; p = 0.77) in the CPAP group compared to the ETI group. Regarding secondary outcomes, compared to the ETI group, no significant differences were found in APGAR at one minute (MD = −1.01; 95%CI −2.97 to 0.94; I2 = 98%; p = 0.31), APGAR at 5 min (MD = −1.00; 95%CI = −2.96 to 0.95; I2 = 99%; p = 0.32), days of hospitalization (MD = −0.52; 95%CI = −1.46 to 0.42; I2 = 94%; p = 0.28), and cord pH (MD = 0.003; 95%CI = −0.01 to 0.02; I2 = 0%; p = 0.79). Conclusions: In patients with MAS, there is no significant effect of CPAP use compared to ETI on primary, specifically on mortality, need for ventilation, the incidence of pneumothorax, and secondary outcomes.
format Review
id oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/1191
institution UPeU
language English
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
record_format dspace
spelling oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/11912026-10-30T16:15:20ZThe Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisToro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J.Hilario-Gomez, Maryori M.Diaz Reyes, Nelson FidelCaballero-Alvarado, José A.Barboza, Joshuan J.NewbornsSystematic reviewCpapMeconium Aspiration SyndromeBackground: In neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may be more beneficial compared to endotracheal intubation (ETI). We evaluated the efficacy of CPAP in neonates with MAS. Methods: Four engines were used to search randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We used relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) to assess the effect on dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. In addition, we used the Paule–Mandel (PM) random effects model due to the anticipated lack of events. Results: Three RCTs were included (n = 432). No significant difference was found in mortality (RR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.54–1.25; I2 = 71%; p = 0.36), need for ventilation (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.15–1.56; I2 = 71%; p = 0.57), and incidence of pneumothorax (RR = 1.24; 95%CI = 0.30–5.12; I2 = 0%; p = 0.77) in the CPAP group compared to the ETI group. Regarding secondary outcomes, compared to the ETI group, no significant differences were found in APGAR at one minute (MD = −1.01; 95%CI −2.97 to 0.94; I2 = 98%; p = 0.31), APGAR at 5 min (MD = −1.00; 95%CI = −2.96 to 0.95; I2 = 99%; p = 0.32), days of hospitalization (MD = −0.52; 95%CI = −1.46 to 0.42; I2 = 94%; p = 0.28), and cord pH (MD = 0.003; 95%CI = −0.01 to 0.02; I2 = 0%; p = 0.79). Conclusions: In patients with MAS, there is no significant effect of CPAP use compared to ETI on primary, specifically on mortality, need for ventilation, the incidence of pneumothorax, and secondary outcomes.Reviewhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35626765https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/5/589/pdf?version=1650534114https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050589PMC913954010.3390/children9050589https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/119135626765W4224282872enChildren2227-90672022-04-212026-06-13T09:49:32Z2026-06-13T09:49:32Z
spellingShingle Newborns
Systematic review
Cpap
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Toro‐Huamanchumo, Carlos J.
Hilario-Gomez, Maryori M.
Diaz Reyes, Nelson Fidel
Caballero-Alvarado, José A.
Barboza, Joshuan J.
The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy of CPAP in Neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of cpap in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Newborns
Systematic review
Cpap
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
topic_facet Newborns
Systematic review
Cpap
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35626765
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/9/5/589/pdf?version=1650534114
https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050589
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/1191
work_keys_str_mv AT torohuamanchumocarlosj theefficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hilariogomezmaryorim theefficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diazreyesnelsonfidel theefficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caballeroalvaradojosea theefficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barbozajoshuanj theefficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT torohuamanchumocarlosj efficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hilariogomezmaryorim efficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diazreyesnelsonfidel efficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caballeroalvaradojosea efficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barbozajoshuanj efficacyofcpapinneonateswithmeconiumaspirationsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis