Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM)
This paper examines the construct validity of the spiritual leadership model proposed by (Fry et al. 2005). The analysis focused on examining the relationships proposed by the model through CFA and structural equation modeling (SEM). A confirmatory factor analysis indicated the SL scale provides acc...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver en el sistema de origen Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) Enlace permanente (DOI o Handle) |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1881508943605268480 |
|---|---|
| author | Martinez-Soto, Lorena Ontiveros Ramírez, Flor Toro Jaramillo, Iván Dario Moreno Leyva, Nelly Rosario |
| author_browse | Martinez-Soto, Lorena Moreno Leyva, Nelly Rosario Ontiveros Ramírez, Flor Toro Jaramillo, Iván Dario |
| author_facet | Martinez-Soto, Lorena Ontiveros Ramírez, Flor Toro Jaramillo, Iván Dario Moreno Leyva, Nelly Rosario |
| author_sort | Martinez-Soto, Lorena |
| collection | Producción científica |
| description | This paper examines the construct validity of the spiritual leadership model proposed by (Fry et al. 2005). The analysis focused on examining the relationships proposed by the model through CFA and structural equation modeling (SEM). A confirmatory factor analysis indicated the SL scale provides acceptable reliability and convergent validity indexes; however, it did not achieve discriminant validity. Model convergence was obtained using MLR (Robust Maximum Likelihood) methods. However, when the robustness indices were analyzed, it was found that some obtained acceptable results and others were deficient, so that an acceptable model fit was not achieved. Regarding the relationship between the hypotheses, it was found that they were significant in all cases except for the reciprocal relationship between vision and altruistic love. In light of this finding, alternative models were developed that also failed to yield significant results. The theoretical and methodological discussion focuses on the relationships of Fry's model and addresses the need to review its causal nature, considering recursive and non-recursive aspects. |
| format | Article |
| id | oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/1086 |
| institution | UPeU |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:cris.upeu.edu.pe:20.500.15037/10862026-11-02T22:00:04ZRevisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM)Martinez-Soto, LorenaOntiveros Ramírez, FlorToro Jaramillo, Iván DarioMoreno Leyva, Nelly RosarioThis paper examines the construct validity of the spiritual leadership model proposed by (Fry et al. 2005). The analysis focused on examining the relationships proposed by the model through CFA and structural equation modeling (SEM). A confirmatory factor analysis indicated the SL scale provides acceptable reliability and convergent validity indexes; however, it did not achieve discriminant validity. Model convergence was obtained using MLR (Robust Maximum Likelihood) methods. However, when the robustness indices were analyzed, it was found that some obtained acceptable results and others were deficient, so that an acceptable model fit was not achieved. Regarding the relationship between the hypotheses, it was found that they were significant in all cases except for the reciprocal relationship between vision and altruistic love. In light of this finding, alternative models were developed that also failed to yield significant results. The theoretical and methodological discussion focuses on the relationships of Fry's model and addresses the need to review its causal nature, considering recursive and non-recursive aspects.Articlehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39288139http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299671PMC1140762910.1371/journal.pone.0299671https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/108639288139W4402556653enPLoS ONE1932-62032024-09-172026-06-13T09:45:44Z2026-06-13T09:45:44Z |
| spellingShingle | Martinez-Soto, Lorena Ontiveros Ramírez, Flor Toro Jaramillo, Iván Dario Moreno Leyva, Nelly Rosario Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM) |
| title | Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM) |
| title_full | Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM) |
| title_fullStr | Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM) |
| title_short | Revisiting Louis Fry’s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling (SEM) |
| title_sort | revisiting louis fry s spiritual leadership model in confessional school teachers using structural equation modeling sem |
| url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39288139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299671 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.15037/1086 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezsotolorena revisitinglouisfrysspiritualleadershipmodelinconfessionalschoolteachersusingstructuralequationmodelingsem AT ontiverosramirezflor revisitinglouisfrysspiritualleadershipmodelinconfessionalschoolteachersusingstructuralequationmodelingsem AT torojaramilloivandario revisitinglouisfrysspiritualleadershipmodelinconfessionalschoolteachersusingstructuralequationmodelingsem AT morenoleyvanellyrosario revisitinglouisfrysspiritualleadershipmodelinconfessionalschoolteachersusingstructuralequationmodelingsem |